<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ourselves Alone, Or Yay, Cameron&#8217;s Back!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toomuchfreetime.net/sci-fi-fantasy/sarah-connor-chronicles/sarah-connor-season-2/ourselves-alone-or-yay-camerons-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toomuchfreetime.net/sci-fi-fantasy/sarah-connor-chronicles/sarah-connor-season-2/ourselves-alone-or-yay-camerons-back/</link>
	<description>What to watch. What to think about it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:04:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greater Czarina</title>
		<link>http://toomuchfreetime.net/sci-fi-fantasy/sarah-connor-chronicles/sarah-connor-season-2/ourselves-alone-or-yay-camerons-back/comment-page-1/#comment-21551</link>
		<dc:creator>Greater Czarina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toomuchfreetime.net/?p=2057#comment-21551</guid>
		<description>I agree, Jack. We need more than a little clarification of at least one of these folks&#039; true agenda. Clearly Shirley Mason (Weaver) is not working with the T-800 faction,  but is she from a different future or the same one in a state of civil war? Dunno, but hopefully we&#039;ll get some answers before this season ends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Jack. We need more than a little clarification of at least one of these folks&#8217; true agenda. Clearly Shirley Mason (Weaver) is not working with the T-800 faction,  but is she from a different future or the same one in a state of civil war? Dunno, but hopefully we&#8217;ll get some answers before this season ends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPassarella</title>
		<link>http://toomuchfreetime.net/sci-fi-fantasy/sarah-connor-chronicles/sarah-connor-season-2/ourselves-alone-or-yay-camerons-back/comment-page-1/#comment-21541</link>
		<dc:creator>JPassarella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toomuchfreetime.net/?p=2057#comment-21541</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this episode as well. (Especially after last week&#039;s head-scratch-fest!) Figures I&#039;d be rooting for Riley minutes before her death! The rest of her stint was an annoyance. At least we know a bit more of Jessie&#039;s agenda, but I think the show stays muddled too long to attract/retain the casual viewer. (My fifteen year old son had been watching up until a few weeks ago. I think he finally gave up.) Still have no clue about Shirley Manson&#039;s character&#039;s agenda. How many futures are vying for control? Sarah&#039;s? John&#039;s? Derek&#039;s? Jessie&#039;s? Cameron&#039;s? Manson&#039;s characters? (name escapes me at the moment!)

I think part of the problem on SCC &amp; Heroes for that matter is that the stuff we want to see costs too much to produce, so they dole it out in very small portions and the stuff that sustains the 45 minutes in an episode gravitates toward the soap-opery. The audience erodes, the budgets tightens, the effects become even more sparse, etc. a vicious circle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this episode as well. (Especially after last week&#8217;s head-scratch-fest!) Figures I&#8217;d be rooting for Riley minutes before her death! The rest of her stint was an annoyance. At least we know a bit more of Jessie&#8217;s agenda, but I think the show stays muddled too long to attract/retain the casual viewer. (My fifteen year old son had been watching up until a few weeks ago. I think he finally gave up.) Still have no clue about Shirley Manson&#8217;s character&#8217;s agenda. How many futures are vying for control? Sarah&#8217;s? John&#8217;s? Derek&#8217;s? Jessie&#8217;s? Cameron&#8217;s? Manson&#8217;s characters? (name escapes me at the moment!)</p>
<p>I think part of the problem on SCC &amp; Heroes for that matter is that the stuff we want to see costs too much to produce, so they dole it out in very small portions and the stuff that sustains the 45 minutes in an episode gravitates toward the soap-opery. The audience erodes, the budgets tightens, the effects become even more sparse, etc. a vicious circle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekBoy</title>
		<link>http://toomuchfreetime.net/sci-fi-fantasy/sarah-connor-chronicles/sarah-connor-season-2/ourselves-alone-or-yay-camerons-back/comment-page-1/#comment-21537</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toomuchfreetime.net/?p=2057#comment-21537</guid>
		<description>Wow, no chatter, eh?  Is anybody out there still watching?  I really enjoyed this episode, if for no other reason than the whole &quot;More Cameron&quot; thing.  And you know, Riley dying.  That should have happened a long time ago, as far I&#039;m concerned.

Did anybody see Summer Glau (as Summer Glau) on this week&#039;s &quot;Big Bang Theory&quot;.  It was a cute appearance on her part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, no chatter, eh?  Is anybody out there still watching?  I really enjoyed this episode, if for no other reason than the whole &#8220;More Cameron&#8221; thing.  And you know, Riley dying.  That should have happened a long time ago, as far I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
<p>Did anybody see Summer Glau (as Summer Glau) on this week&#8217;s &#8220;Big Bang Theory&#8221;.  It was a cute appearance on her part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
